If you are unable to view this e-mail correctly,
click here to open in browser
|
THE EDGE
TAX & LEGAL UPDATE
Vol 3, Part 51
|
Friday, March 15, 2019
|
Fortnightly on GST, FSSAI, RERA & More...
|
|
|
GHIYA LEGAL WISHES YOU ALL
A VERY HAPPY HOLI 2019
|
Ghiya Legal invites articles for publishing in THE EDGE.
Send your contributions to contact@ghiya.in.
|
ITO-19(1)(4), Mumbai Vs. M/s. Dinal Diamonds Bandra (E), Mumbai
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai has held that the department cannot make 100% disallowance for bogus purchases in cases where the sales are not doubted.
Read More
Shri Devraj PKYN Iyer Sharma, MUMBAI Vs. ITO-27(1)(4), MUMBAI
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai bench has held that the tax liability for capital gain cannot arise in the year in which the assessee entered into a development agreement where there was only a promise of allotment of flats was made. The Tribunal clarified that no such tax liability can be imposed when there was no actual allotment was took place.
Read More
The ITO, Ward-1(4), Trivandrum. vs. Prof. Gopinath Muthukad, Muthukad Magical Entertainers Poojappura, Trivandrum
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin bench, while allowing a departmental appeal against Magician Gopinath Muthukad, has held that the deduction under section 80 RR was allowable on the net income received and deposited into Bank account by the assessee in convertible foreign exchange. The assessee had been carrying on his profession and earning income from India and abroad. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) disallowing the claim for certain expenditure raised by the assessee.
Read More
Navas M. Meeran, Adimaly vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1(2), Kochi
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin has held that the assessee by letting out the industrial undertaking is not having any direct connection with the manufacture or production of an article or thing by the assessee and the same cannot be considered as business income eligible for deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Read More
Smt. Gaytri Sharma, vs The ITO, Ward 4(1), Jaipur
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur bench has held that making a wrong claim under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 instead of 54F would not render penal liability under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.
Read More
|
Income Tax
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur vs M/S Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt. Ltd. CIVIL APPEAL No. 2922 OF 2019, Supreme Court of India
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court has held that an Income Tax Appeal would not become infructuous merely due to the reason that the Company’s name was struck down by the registrar of the Companies. The High Court was of the view that since the respondent Company stands dissolved as a result of the order passed by the Registrar of the Companies under Section 560 (5) of the Companies Act, the appeal filed against such Company which stands dissolved does not survive for its consideration on merits. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari said that “In our view, the High Court was wrong in dismissing the appeal as having rendered infructuous.”
Read More
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Pune Versus Income Tax Settlement Commission, Addl. Bench - I, Mumbai & Anr
A division bench of the Bombay High Court has held that an order/ direction passed by the Settlement Commission with retrospective effect is without jurisdiction. The bench comprising Justice M S Sanklecha and Justice Akil Kureshi noted that under Section 245D(2C), the Settlement Commission could declare an application for settlement invalid, but such order has to be passed within prescribed time. “In the present case, the Settlement Commission to overcome such time limit, passed an order giving it retrospective effect. If we recognize the powers of the Settlement Commission to pass such retrospective orders, the time limits envisaged by the legislature at various stages of settlement proceedings would be destroyed,” the bench said.
Read More
GST
M/S H.M. INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD Versus THE COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
The Gujarat High Court has held that the Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) Department cannot provisionally attach bank accounts of directors of the company for recovery of taxes and penalty where the company has failed to pay the taxes and penalty.
Read More
Perfect Boring (P.) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Where Competent Authority for recovery of excise dues of Rs. 55 lakhs had provisionally attached bank accounts of assessee, High Court of Gujarat directed to release attachment over bank accounts subject to assessee furnishing bank guarantee for Rs. 55 lakhs.
Read More
Avinash Aradhya vs Commissioner of Central Tax
Where a complaint had been filed against petitioners for offence punishable under section 137 for indulging in continuous issuance of fake invoices without actual supply of goods with an intention to enable them to fraudulently avail input tax credit, it was held that said offences are compoundable by Commissioner on payment and maximum punishment of five years and, therefore, petitioners were ordered to be released on bail by imposing some stringent conditions.
Read More
GST ADVANCE RULING
In re, EX-SERVICEMEN RESETTLEMENT SOCIETY, AAR WEST BENGAL
The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), West Bengal has held that no GST exemption has been granted to the Security and Scavenging Services to the hospital under the Government.
Read More
NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
Director General of Anti-Profiteering, CBIC & Ors. vs M/S. S3 Infra Reality Pvt. Ltd.
The National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has recently confirmed GST anti-profiteering charges against a Haryana based real estate firm for profiteering over 1.5 crores as it failed to reduce the prices of houses commensurate with the benefit of the input tax credit (ITC) accruing to the developer.
Read More
|
Upcoming due dates under GST & Income Tax Laws:
Due date for issue of TDS Certificate for tax deducted under section 194-IA and section 194-IB in the month of January, 2019 |
17th March 2019 |
GSTR-5 – Monthly return and payment of tax by Non-Resident Foreign Taxpayer for February, 2019 |
20th March 2019 |
GSTR5A – Monthly return and payment of tax by Non-Resident OIDAR Service Provider for February, 2019 |
20th March 2019 |
GSTR-3B (February, 2019) |
20th March 2019 |
Due date for furnishing of challan-cum-statement in respect of tax deducted under section 194-IA and Section 194-IB in the month of February, 2019 |
30th March 2019 |
Last date for filing CMP-02 i.e. migration from regular GST Scheme to Composition Scheme for FY 2019-20 |
31st March 2019 |
Due date for linking of Aadhaar number with PAN |
31st March 2019 |
Due date for furnishing the annual returns in FORM GSTR-9, FORM GSTR-9A and reconciliation statement in FORM GSTR-9C for the Financial Year 2017 – 2018 |
30th June 2019 |
GET
THE EDGE
Notifications
Circulars
Orders
Judgements
Queries
Articles
FAQ
SUBSCRIBE NOW
|
NOTIFICATIONS / AMENDMENTS
CUSTOMS – NON-TARIFF
Notification No. 18/2019-Cus (NT) dt 28.02.2019:
Tariff Notification in respect of Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Sliver.
Read More
Notification No. 19/2019-Cus (NT) dt 01.03.2019:
Amendment to the Notification No. 63/1994-Customs (N.T) dated 21st November, 1994, w.r.t Golakganj LCS.
Read More
Notification No. 20/2019-Cus (NT) dt 06.03.2019:
Notification to give effect the amendment made in the India-Singapore CECA.
Read More
Notification No. 21/2019-Cus (NT) dt 07.03.2019:
Exchange Rates Notification No.21/2019-Custom(NT) dated 07.03.2019.
Read More
CUSTOMS – CIRCULARS
Circular No. 09/2019, dt. 28.02.2019:
Turant Customs-Next generation reform for Ease of Doing Business.
Read More
Circular No. 10/2019, dt. 12.03.2019:
Scheme for Rebate of State and Central taxes and Levies on export of garments and made-ups (RoSCTL).
Read More
SERVICE TAX
Notification No. 01/2019-Service Tax dt 06.03.2019:
Exempting services provided by project implementation agencies under the DDUGKY for the period commencing from the 1st of July,2012 and ending with the 29th of February ,2016 .
Read More
CGST
Notification No. 10/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
To give exemption from registration for any person engaged in exclusive supply of goods and whose aggregate turnover in the financial year does not exceed Rs 40 lakhs.
Read More
Notification No. 11/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
Seeks to prescribe the due dates for furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover upto Rs. 1.5 crores for the months of April, May and June, 2019.
Read More
Notification No. 12/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
Seeks to prescribe the due dates for furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of more than Rs. 1.5 crores for the months of April, May and June, 2019.
Read More
Notification No. 13/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
Seeks to prescribe the due dates for furnishing of FORM GSTR-3B for the months of April, May and June, 2019.
Read More
Notification No. 14/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
Seeks to supersede notification No. 08/2017 - Central Tax dated 27.06.2017 in order to extend the limit of threshold of aggregate turnover for availing Composition Scheme u/s 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 to Rs. 1.5 crores.
Read More
CGST-RATE
Notification No. 02/2019-Central Tax(Rate) dt. 07.03.2019
To give composition scheme for supplier of services with a tax rate of 6% having annual turnover in preceding year upto Rs 50 lakhs.
Read More
UTGST
Notification No. 02/2019-Union Territory Tax dt. 07.03.2019
To give exemption from registration for any person engaged in exclusive supply of goods and whose aggregate turnover in the financial year does not exceed Rs 40 lakhs.
Read More
UTGST-RATE
Notification No. 02/2019-Union Territory Tax (Rate) dt. 07.03.2019
To give composition scheme for supplier of services with a tax rate of 6% having annual turnover in preceding year upto Rs 50 lakhs.
Read More
CGST- CIRCULARS
Circular No. 92/2019-Central Tax dt. 07.03.2019
Circular clarifying various doubts related to treatment of sales promotion scheme under GST.
Read More
Circular No. 93/2019-Central Tax dt. 08.03.2019
Seeks to clarify nature of supply of Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC).
Read More
CGST- ORDERS
Order No. 02/2019- GST dt. 12.03.2019
Appointment of common authority for the purpose of exercise of powers under sections 73,74, 75 and 76 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Read More
CGST- REMOVAL OF DIFFICULTY ORDERS
Order No. 03/2019- Central Tax dt. 08.03.2019
To remove difficulty in implementation of Notification No. 2/2019- Central Tax (Rate).
Read More
|
As per 32nd Meeting of GST Council held on 10th January 2019, what is the exemption limit w.e.f. 01.04.2019 for registration of any person engaged in exclusive supply of goods?
A: 50 Lakhs
B. 40 Lakhs
Click here
Last date to participate: Mar 21, 2019
PREVIOUS WEEK'S WINNERS
Ashit Shah, Mumbai
Upal Banerjee, Kolkata
Sandip Kadam, Vadodara
|
TAX LIABILITY ON MINERAL MINING RIGHTS
The service of granting Mineral Mining Rights by the Government is a taxable supply of service under the provisions of GST. The scenario was the same in the earlier regime also and there was no ambiguity on it. However, there were some doubts with respect to the rate of tax at which the said service would be taxable. Various taxpayers from the industry have filed Advance Rulings before their respective Advance Ruling Authorities to obtain clarity on the Rate of tax applicable on Supply of Service of granting mining rights. The main contention raised by the Applicants M/s.
United Mining Corporation and M/s. Pioneer Partners in their respective Applications before the Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana was that the Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended vide Notification No. 01/2018-Central Tax (Rate) notifies the Central tax on intra-state supply of Service which includes Licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation and the Royalty or Dead Rent paid by the applicant to the Government is nothing but an amount paid for getting right to use the minerals granted to it for a specified period as per terms of the lease.
It was therefore contended that the services of right to use natural resources classify under heading 9973 and since description of service under Serial no. (i) to (vii) does not cover such services of right to use minerals therefore it would fall under the residual entry at serial no. 17(viii). Being so, the rate of tax applicable on such services shall be the same rate of tax as applicable on supply of like goods involving transfer of title in goods. The Authority for Advance Ruling was in consonance with the above submissions and decided the Application accordingly.
However, the said Entry has now been amended with effect from 31.12.2018 by way of Notification No. 27/2018-CT(Rate) dated 31.12.2018 by way of which the rate of tax has been fixed at the rate of 18% instead of the same being dependant on the rate of tax on like goods involving transfer of title in goods.
Similar Application has also been filed before the Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan in the case of M/s. Aravali Polyart Pvt. Ltd. where it is held by the Authority on 15.02.2019 that they are in agreement with the fact that the said service falls under Entry (viii) of Serial no. 17 and falls under Chapter heading 9973 but in the light of the said Amendment, now the service of leasing of mineral mining rights would be at the rate of 18% and not at the rate of the like goods at which they are supplied with effect from 31.12.2018.
Therefore, in the light of the above amendment the Tax Rate on Dead Rent / Royalty paid by the Taxpayer has been confirmed to be 18% and it will not be dependent on the rate of Supply of goods involved and the earlier Advance Rulings on this issue do not hold good because of the amendment in the GST Rate Notification for Services.
|
-
Press Release by PIB dated 01.03.2019:
The Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs, Shri Arun Jaitley releases a Compendium of Instructions on GST Refunds and a Copy of the Operational Manual on Internal Audit.
Read More
-
Press release by PIB dated 05.03.2019: FM:
Process of Reforms to continue; Focus on lower tax rate and wider tax base; Government committed to keep the Growth Momentum High and Inclusive to ensure that the benefits of growth reaches to all sections of the society including the vulnerable and weaker sections.
Read More
-
Press release by PIB dated 07.03.2019:
Implementation of various decisions taken by the GST Council for the MSME Sector; Issue of Notifications there of
Read More
|
Editorial Team :
Meenal Ghiya, Priyamvada Joshi & Deepak Garg
Disclaimer: "The Edge" is meant for informational purpose only and does not claim to be advice or opinion, legal or otherwise, whatsoever. The information provided is not intended to create any advocate-client relationship and is not for advertising. The views expressed by the Author(s) are their personal views.
Click here to Unsubscribe
|
|
|
|