If you are unable to view this e-mail correctly,
click here to open in browser
|
THE EDGE
TAX & LEGAL UPDATE
Vol 1, Part 16
|
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2017
|
Weekly on GST, FSSAI, RERA & More...
|
|
|
Join WhatsApp Group
FROM EDITOR'S DESK
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in a landmark Judgment upheld the Constitutional Validity of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 earlier this week. This came as a huge sigh of relief to all the home buyers. The law is pro consumers and protects their rights. The court held that the builders are covered under this law allowing consumers to claim compensation in case of delay in possession. It is also applicable to the ongoing projects. Another important judgment was passed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court by way of which relief was given to those asking for Input Tax Credit on pre-GST lying for more than 12 months. This is a great step taken by the Judiciary to understand the practical difficulties being faced by the businessmen under GST regime and giving relaxation to them.
Please contact us at contact@ghiya.in
PANKAJ GHIYA, ADVOCATE
Mobile: +91 98290 13626
TIMELINES
Upcoming due dates under GST & Income Tax Laws:
GSTR-4 (July-Sep, Composition Dealers) |
24th Dec (No need to file GSTR-4A) |
GSTR-5A (OIDAR) (July, August, September, October) |
15th Dec |
GSTR-3B (Nov) |
20th Dec |
GSTR-6 (July, Input Service Distributor) |
31st Dec |
GST ITC-04 |
31st Dec |
GSTR-1 (Jul-Sep) Turnover upto 1.5 Cr, Quarterly Return |
31st Dec |
GSTR-1 (Jul-Oct) Turnover above 1.5 Cr, Monthly Return |
31st Dec |
GSTR REG-26 |
31st Dec |
GST TRAN-1 (With Revision Facility) |
27th Dec |
GET
THE EDGE
Notifications
Circulars
Orders
Judgements
Queries
Articles
SUBSCRIBE NOW
|
MISCELLANEOUS
-
Steps to file Refund Application on GST Portal.
Read More
-
Input Service Distributors can now file GSTR-6 on GST Portal.
Read More
-
CBDT extends date till 31.3.18 for linking of Aadhaar with PAN
Read More
-
Provisions of the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill, 2017 meant to protect interests of depositors
Read More
-
Tweet FAQs released by CBEC
FAQ 1
FAQ 2
FAQ 3
FAQ 4
FAQ 5
FAQ 6
|
|
RECENT AMENDMENTS
CUSTOMS
Notification No. 113/2017-Cus (NT),dt. 07.12.2017
Exchange Rates Notification
Read More
CUSTOMS CIRCULARS
Circular No. 48/2017-Customs dt. 08.12.2017
Clarification on Customs ( Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty) Rules, 2017
Read More
COMPANIES ACT
General Circular No. 15/2017 dt. 04.12.2017
Relaxation of additional fees and extension of last date for filing form CRA-4 under the Companies Act, 2013
Read More
INCOME TAX
Circular No. 28/2017 dt. 07.11.2017
Clarification on Indirect Transfer provisions in case of redemption of share or interest outside India under the Income-tax Act, 1961
Read More
ITAT JUDGEMENTS
JAIPUR BENCH
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Smt. Sheena Mathur
Counsel: Shri S. L. Poddar & Isha Kanungo (Adv)
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) was right in allowing the revised return of Rs. 30,64,640/- instead of original return of Rs. 86,23,850/-.
Appeal of the Revenue dismissed.
Read More
AHMEDABAD BENCH
Bank of Baroda v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Where assessee-bank had deducted TDS under section 194A but same was deposited after a delay, interest under section 201(1A) should be levied only from date on which tax was deducted and till date on which tax was deposited.
Read More
KOLKATA BENCH
Assistant Director of Income-tax (International Taxation)- Kolkata v. Timken Company
Expenses incurred out of India earlier paid by assessee were reimbursed in India by Indian subsidiary, assessee being not recipient of sums in question and being only a conduit for payment by Indian subsidiary to third party service provider, said payment could not be charged to tax in hands of assessee.
Read More
MUMBAI BENCH
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Growmore Leasing & Investment Ltd.
Where assessee purchased IRFC bonds owned by one HM and sold the same back to HM within a short period of 15 days and in this process claimed loss and also received tax free interest from these IRFC bonds, transactions of purchase and sale of bonds in question not being carried on during course of business was not a business activity, hence, provisions of section 94(4) would not be applicable.
Read More
FROM THE BENCH
INCOME TAX
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 11(1), Bangalore v. ACE Multi Axes Systems Ltd.
Even though eligible business of an assessee is given benefit of deduction under section 80-IB on assessee satisfying conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 80-IB, yet benefit of said deduction can be denied subsequently on ground that during 10 consecutive years, it ceases to be a small scale industry.
Read More
GST
M/S Ramdev Trading Company And Another Vs State Of UP And 3 Others
Goods detained while in transit from Rajasthan to Assam in Gorakhpur, U.P. on the ground of being transported without Transit Declaration Forms and that the goods were described incorrectly. Penalty order was passed on the basis that there was intent to evade tax though the goods were never unloaded in U.P. Seizure & penalty orders unsustainable & set aside - Therefore, the goods & vehicle be released & penalty set aside.
Read More
RERA
Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. and anr. VS. Union of India and Others
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court upholds the validity of Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016
Read More
CENTRAL EXCISE
India Containers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs
Where assessee filed SLP against judgment of HC and, on merits, submitted that HC relied upon non-existent provisions under Central Excise Act to impose penalty, registry was directed to issue notice on revenue and further recovery of penalty was stayed.
Read More
Weekly Quiz
|
RECENT PUBLICATIONS
GST Law & Practice, 5th Edition, updated till 21st Nov 2017, released at AIFTP National Tax Convention at Jabalpur by Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, Mr. Justice Deepak Misra on 02.12.2017
Buy Now
|
|
|
HIGH SEA SALES - Ms. PRIYAMVADA JOSHI, ADVOCATE
|
High Sea Sale means a transaction which takes place at the time of import of goods while the goods are on high seas. The sale is effected by transfer of documents of title to goods before the goods cross the customs frontiers. Once the goods are sold at high sea, the Bill of Entry is filed by the person who buys goods from the original importer. For the purpose of Customs Valuation the contract price paid by the last High Sea Sale buyer was taken into consideration.
|
Under GST, Imports by virtue of Section 7(2) of IGST Act, 2017 are subject to IGST which says that supply of goods imported into the territory of India till they cross the Customs frontier, shall be treated as an Inter-state supply. High Sea Sales are similar to Inter-State Transactions and therefore, IGST would be levied on such supply. There were confusions with respect to the time when and how many times Tax would be levied on such transactions. The Government vide Circular No. 33/2017-Customs dt. 01.08.2017 has clarified that IGST on high sea sale (s) transactions of imported goods, whether one or multiple, shall be levied and collected only at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before the Customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes for the first time. Further, value addition accruing in each such high sea sale shall form part of the value on which IGST is collected at the time of clearance. Therefore, it is clear now that IGST would be levied only once when the goods are cleared at Customs. The last buyer would be required to produce the entire chain of documents. Like HSS agreement, Invoice, etc. to establish a connection between the first and last transaction. Therefore, the ambiguities in respect of High Sea Sale Supplies have now been removed.
|
|
Editorial Team :
Meenal Ghiya, Priyamvada Joshi, Ankit Agrawal, Deepak Garg
Disclaimer: "The Edge" is meant for informational purpose only and does not claim to be advice or opinion, legal or otherwise, whatsoever. The information provided is not intended to create any advocate-client relationship and is not for advertising. The views expressed by the Author(s) are their personal views.
Click here to Unsubscribe
|
|